Friday, January 5, 2024

'One Baptism for the remission of sins'

 



Dear Parish Faithful & Friends in Christ,

“I acknowledge one Baptism for the remission of sins” (Nicene Creed)


The Great Feast of Theophany is more ancient that that of Christ’s Nativity. In fact, it was precisely on January 6 that the Church first celebrated Christ’s birth (and the adoration of the Magi), together with His baptism in the Jordan. These events—of the greatest significance not only in the life of Christ but in the “economy” of our salvation—were united in one celebration known as “Theophany,” which means “manifestation of God.” (The Feast is also referred to as “Epiphany,” which simply means “manifestation.”) In His Nativity and in His Baptism, Christ is “manifested,” or “revealed,” to the world as the Light of the world in order to dispel the darkness of ignorance and spiritual blindness which are the direct result of sin. This Feast of Theophany is also referred to as the “Feast of Lights.” 

It was in the fourth century that we began to celebrate our Lord’s Nativity (and the adoration of the Magi) as a separate and unique event on December 25, while January 6 remained as the Feast of Theophany, on which Christ’s Baptism was commemorated. Why did the Feast of January 6 retain the title “Theophany/Epiphany” instead of December 25, when the manifestation of the eternal Light was first revealed in His Nativity in the flesh? Saint John Chrysostom writes that it is “because it was not when He was born that He became manifest to all, but when He was baptized; for up to this day He was unknown to the majority.”

But not only was the Lord Jesus revealed to the world as He began His public ministry with His Baptism in the Jordan at the hands of Saint John the Forerunner. The Holy Trinity was manifested, for the “voice of the Father” bore witness to His beloved Son, and the Spirit, “in the form of a dove” - to paraphrase the troparion of the Feast - descended and rested upon the Son. The Trinitarian nature of God was manifested when Christ came to the Jordan to be baptized.

Yet, if Baptism is for the “remission of sins,” then why is Christ baptized, for He is without sin [1 Peter 2:22; Hebrews 4:15]? 

The liturgical texts repeatedly ask and answer this question for us in the following manner: “Though as God He needs no cleansing, yet for the sake of fallen man He is cleansed in the Jordan,” and “As a man He is cleansed, that I may be made clean.” 

Christ is representative of all humanity. He is baptized for our sake. It is we who are cleansed and regenerated when He descends into the waters of the Jordan. For with Christ, and in Christ, our human nature—the human nature He assumed in all of its fullness in the Incarnation—descends into the cleansing and purifying waters of the Jordan (anticipating sacramental Baptism), so that the very same human nature may ascend out of the waters renewed, restored and recreated. As the New and Last Adam, He “sums up” all of us in Himself—for this reason He became man. 

The Spirit descends and rests upon Christ, so that our humanity may be anointed in Him. Saint Athanasios the Great writes: “when He is anointed… we it is who in Him are anointed…. When He is baptized, we it is who in Him are baptized.”  

Every Baptism is an “extension of” and a “participation in” the one, unique Baptism of Christ; just as every Eucharist is an “extension of” and a “participation in” the one, unique Mystical Supper. Actually, all of creation participates and is sanctified by the manifestation of God’s Son in the flesh: “At Thine appearing in the body, the earth was sanctified, the waters blessed, the heavens enlightened.”
We die to sin in Baptism and are raised to new life—for this reason the baptismal font is both tomb and womb, as Saint Cyril of Jerusalem tells us. Our pre- and post-baptismal lives must manifest some real change, according to Saint Gregory of Nyssa. 

In fact, I would like to append a few paragraphs from some of Saint Gregory’s writings about Baptism in order to allow him to describe the meaning of that need for change. Saint Gregory wrote in the fourth century—a time when he could presuppose adult baptism as the norm—but we can apply his teaching to our own consciousness of being Christians as we grow up in the Faith following “infant Baptism.”
Saint Gregory writes in his work known as The Great Catechism:

When discussing Baptism and spiritual birth, we have to consider what happens to our life following Baptism.
This is a point which many of those who approach the grace of Baptism neglect; they delude themselves by being born in appearance only and not in reality. For through birth from above, our life is supposed to undergo a change. But if we continue in our present sinful state, then there is really no change in us. Indeed, I do not see how a man who continues to be the same can be considered to have become different when there is no noticeable change in him…. 

Now the physically born child certainly shares his parents’ nature. If you have been born of God and have become His child, then let your way of life testify to the presence of God within you. Make it clear Who your Father is!
For the very attributes by which we recognize God are the very marks by which a child of His must reveal His relationship with God. ‘God is goodness and there is no unrighteousness in Him…. The Lord is gracious to all…. He loves His enemies…. He is merciful and forgives transgressions.’ These and many other characteristics revealed by the Scripture are what make a Godly life…. 

If you are like this and you embody the Spirit of God, then you have genuinely become a child of God, but if you persist in displaying evil, then it is useless to prattle to yourself and to others about your birth from above. You are still merely a son of man, not a son of that Most High God! You love lies and vanity, and you are still immersed in the corruptible things of this world.
Don’t you know in what way a man becomes a child of God? Why, in no other way than by becoming holy!

It is a serious matter, indeed, to "put on Christ" in the Sacrament of Baptism. A baptized Christian represents Christ to the world of everyday living. Therefore, not only great privileges are granted to baptized Christians, but also great responsibilities!

 

Friday, December 29, 2023

The Threat of Dehumanization

 


 

I was recently reading an article concerning a current political and social issue by Peter Wehner, a Christian writer and leader of the Trinity Forum. In the middle of his article, I encountered this paragraph in which Peter Wehner calls the reader's attention to a process that is becoming more and more common in today's public discourse: The tendency to reduce the humanity of one's opponents and enemies. This process is called dehumanization. Here is the relevant paragraph from Peter Wehner's article:

"Dehumanizers view their targets as having “a human appearance but a subhuman essence,” according to David Livingstone Smith, a philosophy professor who has written on the history and complicated psychological roots of dehumanization. “It is the dehumanizer’s nagging awareness of the other’s humanity that gives dehumanization its distinctive psychological flavor,” he writes. “Ironically, it is our inability to regard other people as nothing but animals that leads to unimaginable cruelty and destructiveness.” Dehumanized people can be turned into something worse than animals; they can be turned into monsters. They aren’t just dangerous; they are metaphysically threatening. They are not just subhuman; they are irredeemably destructive."

We should be aware of the fact that two of the most infamous tyrants of the 20th c. - Hitler and Mussolini - called their enemies "vermin." (Lenin and Stalin called them “enemies of the people”). Ominously, the reduction of human beings – perceived as the enemy – to the level of vermin has recently entered into our own public/political discourse. Has that term ever been used before? This is dehumanization in an extreme form, for vermin are simply not human (the word comes from the Middle English - borrowed from the Anglo-French - verm or worm). To describe human beings as "vermin" is to strip them of their humanity, to reduce human beings to people perceived as despicable and dangerous to humanity. This is the dangerous rhetoric, indeed. This supports the definition of dehumanization above by David Livingstone Smith. Vermin, in the words of a parishioner, can only be treated by “extermination.” Hence, violence against such “monsters” is legitimized. We know the horrid results of this dehumanization of living human beings in the ghastly reigns of Hitler and Mussolini. And, for good measure, we can add Lenin and Stalin.

Obviously and tragically, human beings dehumanize themselves through repeated acts of serious sin. This is true of tyrants, dictators and killers. This is why criminal justice and prison systems exist: Human beings can do horrible things that dehumanize themselves and the people that they victimize. It is our responsibility to recognize this when it happens. We call this discernment. Only in this way, can we struggle against the nefarious and even malignant spread of sin, systemic or personal. But Peter Wehner in the passage above is pointing to the troubling trend of dehumanizing the actually decent people who may oppose us ideologically - or even, simply, politically. It is easy to fall prey to this if we lack vigilance or simply allow ourselves to be swept up into such careless discourse. We can easily lose sight of the humanity of the "other side." Is this happening within our own country?

Our goal as Orthodox Christians is to ceaselessly affirm the true humanity of all persons. It is by this affirmation of the other that we acknowledge that each and every human being has been created in the image and likeness of God. We cannot resort to the rhetoric that degenerates to the level of calling other human beings "vermin." We must oppose it even when employed by a person that we tend to agree with or support. In fact, the use of this abusive language may just challenge our own discernment in supporting such a person. Our goal is to humanize, not dehumanize, our neighbor - even if we strongly disagree with such a neighbor. 

I would like to re-emphasize, that what I am writing is in no way promoting a relativistic tolerance of sinful behavior (as in: no matter what someone actually does, ultimately we are all fine so we shouldn’t criticize anyone or challenge their beliefs or motives); or even with the non-acknowledgment of how deep-rooted sin deprives a human being of his/her humanity - sin can indeed be dehumanizing. But I was struck by what the philosopher David Livingstone Smith has written on the topic, which serves as a warning to what can happen among decent and well-intentioned people. Is not this what happened under both Hitler and Mussolini in Germany and Italy respectively? Is not the resurgence today, within our own society, of the irrational and wholly unjustified rise of both antisemitism and Islamophobia following the outbreak of war between Israel and Hamas, a warning sign of just how this can happen, even in a democratic society that prides itself on tolerance and civility? Once common civility – or basic deceny- is abandoned when responding to one’s ideological opponents, then the guardrails have been removed, and then, more-or-less, anything is permitted.

When we again celebrate the Nativity of our Lord Jesus Christ, we commemorate His birth in the flesh, but also the renewal of human nature, the very human nature that the eternal Son of God assumed in the womb of His mother. We call this renewal of human nature the deification of that very human nature which had been estranged from God through sin and death. The healing of human nature begins with the Incarnation and subsequent passing of that human nature through death and into the light of the resurrection and its future glorification. That process is not “mechanical” or “magical.” It is given as a potential gift to those who consciously and freely accept that gift and then make an honest attempt to live according to the will of God. This is the noble challenge of being a disciple of Jesus Christ. To contend with our own ignoble tendencies may be equivalent to bearing a cross. But if we pursue that goal of reflecting the presence of Christin our lives honestly, we will always be able to see the humanity of other human beings, fallen and sinful though we and they may actually be.

It is true that we “dehumanize” ourselves through our sinful actions, words and thoughts. But we cannot allow ourselves to dehumanize our religious, ideological or political adversaries by the dangerous rhetoric that is becoming more and more widespread – and tolerated - in the current divisiveness of our contemporary world. And right here in our country. As Christians we can never align ourselves with referencing other human beings as “vermin.” Christians are responsible for opposing such a sinful breakdown of decent civil discourse, not for the sake of “good manners,” but in the Name of our Lord Jesus Christ, the One who is truly philanthropos. 

- Fr. Steven

 

Thursday, December 28, 2023

The Glory of God

 


Dear Parish Faithful,

CHRIST IS BORN!  GLORIFY HIM!

One of the great Orthodox homilists of the 19th c. was St. Philaret, Metropolitan of Moscow (+1867). He combined great rhetorical skills with a deep knowledge of the Scriptures and an in-depth awareness of the inexhaustible resources of Orthodox theology. In one of his many Nativity homilies, Met. Philaret chose as his main focus, the following text from St. Luke's Gospel: 

And suddenly there was with the Angel a multitude of the heavenly host praising God and saying, Glory to God in the highest! (Lk. 2:13)

There follows in this homily a remarkable passage about the meaning of the term "the glory of God." I have seen this passage cited by later Orthodox theologians (such as Vladimir Lossky and John Meyendorff), in numerous publications because of its penetrating depth into the biblical and theological concept of the glory of God. It is more than timely to read these words during the Nativity season as we join the angels in precisely praising God with the words "Glory to God in the highest!" This text forms the deepest content of the ancient hymn known as the Great Doxology:

Glory is the revelation, a manifestation, a reflection, an externalization of inner perfection. God, from eternity, is revealed to Himself in the eternal birth of the Son of God, and in the eternal procession of the Holy Spirit, both of whom are one in essence with the Father. In this way, unity in the Holy Trinity shines forth essentially in an undimmed and unchanging glory.
God the Father is the Father of glory (Eph. 1:17), the Son of God is the brightness of His glory (Heb. 1:3), and Himself has the glory which [He] had with the [Father] ... before the world was (Jn. 17:5). Equally, the Spirit of God is the Spirit of glory (I Pet. 4:14). The blessed God who is above all glory abides in His own internal glory, so that He does not require any other witnesses and does not need any participants in His glory.
However, since, by His endless goodness and love, He desires to communicate His blessedness to have gracious participants in His glory, He moved outward with His endless perfections, and they are manifested in His creation. His glory appears to the heavenly powers, is reflected in mankind, and is dressed in the beauty of the visible world. He gives it, and it is accepted by its participants, and then it returns to Him, and this circle of the glory of God comprises the blessed life and the prosperity of creation.

 

Toward the end of the same homily, Met. Philaret draws the faithful into this glorification of God in the presence of the Mystery of the Incarnation with the following rhetorical flourish:

This is the glorious mystery and mysterious power of this day! Heavenly servants of the light saw the dawning of this glory before we ever did, and immediately, having turned to Him, they declared, Glory to God in the highest! Now it is no longer the morning, but the full day of this glory. Let our doxology rise up. Let it go up also to the inhabitants of Heaven. Let our own words rise up in the joyful ecstasy of the heart to the very throne of the Almighty: "Glory to God in the highest!"

Thursday, December 21, 2023

Shared Points in the Gospel Infancy Narratives

 


 

Dear Parish Faithful,

"In the form of God all things were made by Him (Jn. 1:3); in the form of a servant, he himself was born of a woman, born under the law (Gal. 4:4)."  — St. Augustine - The Trinity

Yesterday's Nativity Narrative Test highlighted the differences between the two Gospels in the presentation of Christ's Nativity. Yet, we do not want to lose sight of the many "shared points" which are of great importance. This list was compiled by the eminent biblical scholar Raymond Brown. I hope that you find this quite helpful.


Eleven Shared Points in the Two Infancy Narratives of the Evangelists Matthew and Luke

+ The parents to be are Mary and Joseph who are legally engaged or married, but have not yet come to live together or have sexual relations (MATT. 1:18; LK. 1:27,34).

+ Joseph is of Davidic descent (MATT. 1:16,20; LK. 1:27,32; 2:4).

+ There is an angelic announcement of the forthcoming birth of the child (MATT. 1:20-23; LK. 1:30-35).

+ The conception of the child by Mary is not through intercourse with her husband (MATT. 1:20, 23,25; LK. 1:34).

+ The conception is through the Holy Spirit (Matt. 1:18,20; Lk. 1:35

+ There is a directive from the angel that the child is to be named Jesus (MATT. 1:21;LK. 1:31)

+ An angel states that Jesus is to be Savior (MATT. 1:21; LK. 2:11).

+ The birth of the child takes place after the parents have come to live together (MATT. 1:24-25; LK. 2:5-6).

+ The birth takes place at Bethlehem (MATT. 2:1; LK. 2:4-6)

+ The birth is chronologically related to the reign (days) of Herod the Great (MATT. 2:1; LK. 1:5).

+ The child is reared at Nazareth (MATT. 2:23; LK. 2:39).

From The Birth of the Messiah, by Raymond Brown, p. 34-35



Wednesday, December 20, 2023

Nativity Narrative Test

 


Dear Parish Faithful,

Here is an old "war horse" that I have sent out over the years; but since we have so many new parishioners, I hope that this Test will generate some interest. How well do we know the Scriptures, and here more specifically about the Nativity Narratives in the Gospels of Sts. Matthew and Luke?

Be that as it may - enjoy and see how  well you do!

 

Nativity Narrative Test

The following test questions should be answered by using the following key:

M – St. Matthew    |     L – St. Luke  

ML – Sts. Matthew & Luke   |   N – Neither Gospel

 

1. This Gospel contains a sequence of revelatory dreams to St. Joseph _____

2. This Gospel has an ox and an ass by the manger of the Christ Child _____

3. This Gospel mentions the census that takes Joseph and Mary to Bethlehem _____

4. This Gospel contains the genealogy of Christ that begins with the Patriarch Abraham _____

5. This Gospel narrates the massacre of the Innocents _____

6. This Gospel narrates the visit of three magi who bring gifts to the Christ Child _____

7. This Gospel narrates the angelic visitation to shepherds watching their flocks _____

8. This Gospel contains references to King Herod _____

9. This Gospel narrates that Christ was born in the Hebrew month equivalent to Dec. _____

10. This Gospel contains the prophecy of Isaiah that a “virgin” shall conceive _____

11. This Gospel narrates the journey of the “Holy Family” to Egypt and back to Israel _____

12. This Gospel narrates that Jesus was wrapped in swaddling cloths _____

13. This Gospel refers to Jesus as the Word of God _____

14. This Gospel tells us that the name of Christ’s mother is Mary _____

15. This Gospel narrates the circumcision of the eight-day old Jesus _____

16. This Gospel narrates that Jesus was born in a cave/stable/house _____

17. This Gospel informs us that Jesus was born in the town of Bethlehem _____

18. This Gospel tells us that after His birth, Jesus returned to Nazareth _____

19. This Gospel refers to the Roman emperor Caesar Augustus _____

20. This Gospel mentions women in the genealogy of Christ _____